Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Joe Tyler vs Luke Simkiss Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tyler vs Simkiss analysis and find out who is favored!
Joe Tyler vs Luke Simkiss Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tyler has won 44.44% of points on his second serve, while Simkiss has won 43.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tyler, in recent form, has won 50.7% of his opponent's second serve points, while Simkiss has won 44.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.54% and 23.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tyler has saved 48.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Simkiss has saved 50.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tyler has won 53.57% of matches played (W/L 15/ 13), with Simkiss winning 45.71% (W/L 16/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tyler has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 15/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Simkiss has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Tyler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.57% of matches (W/L 15/ 13), where as Simkiss has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.71% of matches (W/L 16/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tyler winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tyler winning 2 and Simkiss winning 0. The last match between Tyler and Simkiss was at the M25 Nottingham, 28-04-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Joe Tyler getting the victory 6-4 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tyler and Simkiss have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tyler winning 0 times and Simkiss 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Tyler winning 1, and Simkiss 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tyler has played against opponents with an average rank of 58.04 while Simkiss has played against players with an average rank of 138.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tyler has won 86% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Simkiss has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tyler has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Simkiss has converted 32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tyler 1 - 0 Simkiss
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
859
Rank
830
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
51% (52-50)
Career Total W/L
50% (47-47)
61% (11-7)
YTD W/L
13% (1-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Joe Tyler | Luke Simkiss |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:0 | 1:40:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (61/80) | 70% (46/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (44/61) | 74% (34/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (9/19) | 45% (9/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (23/66) | 34% (27/80) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Joe Tyler
Player
Luke Simkiss
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Joe Tyler | Luke Simkiss |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (11/7) | 13% (1/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (23/17) | 30% (6/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (196/186) | 47% (99/110) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 17% (1/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 27 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 16 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 71.44 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (395/566) | 64% (248/389) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (236/395) | 69% (171/248) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (76/171) | 45% (63/141) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (18/42) | 35% (8/23) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (211/587) | 32% (116/362) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 61% (11/7) | 13% (1/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (11/18) | 13% (1/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (4/0) |
Joe Tyler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joe Tyler
Player
Mattias Southcombe
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 2-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joe Tyler
Player
Luke Simkiss
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Joe Tyler
84%
(
56 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
2
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aristarkh Safonov
Player
Joe Tyler
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Joe Tyler
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
George Houghton
Player
Joe Tyler
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Luke Simkiss Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Joe Tyler
Player
Luke Simkiss
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Luke Simkiss
76%
(
77 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ronetto Van Tilburg
Player
Luke Simkiss
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 1-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Luke Simkiss
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
4
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Jones
Player
Luke Simkiss
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eero Vasa
Player
Luke Simkiss
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Luke Simkiss
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tyler Vs Simkiss Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
